Journal of
Marketing Development and Competitiveness

Scholar Gateway

Abstracts prior to volume 5(1) have been archived!

Issue 5(1), October 2010 -- Paper Abstracts
Girard  (p. 9-22)
Cooper (p. 23-32)
Kunz-Osborne (p. 33-41)
Coulmas-Law (p.42-46)
Stasio (p. 47-56)
Albert-Valette-Florence (p.57-63)
Zhang-Rauch (p. 64-70)
Alam-Yasin (p. 71-78)
Mattare-Monahan-Shah (p. 79-94)
Nonis-Hudson-Hunt (p. 95-106)


Comparative Advertising as a Competitive Tool

Author(s): Kaylene C. Williams, Robert A. Page, Jr.

Citation: Kaylene C. Williams, Robert A. Page, Jr., (2013) "Comparative Advertising as a Competitive Tool," Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, Vol. 7, Iss. 4, pp. 47 - 62

Article Type: Research paper

Publisher: North American Business Press


Comparative advertising can be an effective way for new brands to break into markets and for
established or tired brands to reposition and regain lost market share. Over one-third of advertising is
comparative in nature, while approximately one-quarter of advertising directly identifies or names the
competitive brand. (Freeman, 1987) Given that comparative advertising is so prevalent, the focal point of
this paper is how to improve the use of comparative advertising. The topics in this paper include:
definition and use of comparative advertising, history and background of comparative ads, the pros and
cons of using comparative ads, how comparative advertising functions, and guidelines for the improved
use of comparative ads.